Did you get stopped by Clermont Police Officer Cecil Garrett?

os-clermont-police-300x169

Image from orlandosentinel.com

Officer Cecil Garrett was arrested on July 26, 2017, on five counts of perjury committed by false written declaration following a criminal investigation conducted by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement that was initiated after the Clermont Police Chief Chuck Broadway notified them of numerous citizen complaints about Officer Garrett dating back to June of 2016. Officer Garrett is accused of writing in his arresting reports that he initiated traffic stops after running the vehicle’s tag and confirming the driver had a suspended license; however, computer logs showed he had already initiated the traffic stops before he actually ran the tag. Officer Garrett is currently on administrative leave without pay pending the outcome of the criminal case. Perjury is a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

So what does this mean for your case? A law enforcement officer must have a lawful basis to initiate a traffic stop and cannot pull someone over without first establishing probable cause to do so. Examples of probable cause to pull a vehicle over would include the officer observing the driver committing a traffic violation, running the vehicle’s tag and finding that the registration is expired or the driver’s license is suspended or observing someone driving erratically. If a law enforcement officer initiates a traffic stop without probable cause then any evidence obtained during that traffic stop cannot be used against the defendant by the State Attorney and must be thrown out. Evidence obtained through unlawful traffic stops is often referred to as ‘fruit of the poisonous tree:’ if the stop is unlawful then any evidence stemming from that stop is also deemed unlawfully obtained and unusable.

For example, in Officer Garrett’s situation, if he had already initiated the traffic stop and his probable cause for doing so was his belief that the driver had a suspended license, but he did not actually run the tag or otherwise have information that would establish his belief the driver’s license was suspended was reasonable before he initiated the traffic stop, then he would not have established the necessary probable cause and the stop would be unlawful. Any evidence Officer Garrett then obtained during that traffic stop would be unlawful and thrown out. This has already resulted in ten cases being dismissed against defendants pulled over by Officer Garrett. An officer must have probable cause established before initiating the stop, they cannot find probable cause or gather evidence after the stop has already been initiated to then justify their decision to pull someone over. This would also apply to situations where officers find drugs, drug paraphernalia, and weapons in vehicles. If the officer did not establish probable cause to initiate the traffic stop then any evidence of illegal possession obtained during the traffic stop will not be admissible in court and the case will likely be dismissed.

Posted in:
Updated:

Comments are closed.

Client Reviews

★★★★★

I would like thank my attorney Thomas Luka. I knew from the beginning I had the right guy in my corner. While celebrating with family and friends at a Public Park in Seminole County, a fight broke out among various people. Myself, and a good friend, broke up the fight and the instigators left. Six months later, I was wrongly accused as the person who started the fight. The first attorney I hired could not even get a response from the State Attorney handling the case. Someone referred me to Tom and I felt comfortable at his demeanor and reactions.

After conversations with Tom, who knew I would settle for nothing less than a FULL DISMISSAL due to my innocence, I hired him. His firm of Adams and Luka did the due diligence by interviewing witnesses and the police who were on the scene, as well as starting a dialogue with the State Attorney. After gathering statements from witnesses, Tom was able to present a strong argument on my behalf to the State Attorney on why the case should be dismissed. If the State Attorney was not willing to dismiss the case, Tom was ready to take the case to trial.

The result by Thomas Luka: Case Dismissed.

I am 53 years old with a spotless record and glad to keep it that way thanks to the time, effort, hard work, and professionalism of the Adams and Luka and Tom Luka.

Earl from Mesquite
★★★★★
Thomas Luka left a life-long great impression of lawyers. He was always professional, on time, and answered things honestly. From the start and during the 14 months it went on - Tom was very upfront and honest with me about the possible outcomes. The result was better than I had hoped for. Tom really over-delivered. HIGHLY RECCOMEND. Marcela Giorgi
★★★★★
Adams and Luka were very professional and savvy in the courtroom. When you're in court with Mr. Luka you will think you have the best attorney there. I recommend this law firm. Pioneer Tech
★★★★★
Rich Adams is an outstanding criminal attorney. I have had the opportunity to refer several friends and clients to his practice for handling of criminal matters, and on every occasion he has produced an excellent result. Rich practices with attention to detail, a thorough knowledge of the law, and a passion to defend his clients. I will continue to refer clients to Rich Adams, and would strongly recommend him for your legal needs. Brian Pink