The police visited me and I was accused of stalking my Ex. What should I do?

A stalker does not just have to be a creep hiding in the bushes or following 3 cars behind you everywhere you go. A stalker does not have to wear all-black clothing and have a bag full of spy gear. Often people can be accused of stalking for sending unwanted gifts or trying to contact an ex who does not want to be contacted. A situation can quickly be blown out of proportion if the other person doesn’t like your actions and you can find yourself facing a stalking or voyeurism charge.


As stated in Florida Statute 784.048, stalking means “A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses (acts causing a person severe emotional distress), or cyberstalks another person.” Here, stalking will require a course of conduct, meaning a person will commit a series of acts, such as following you to work every day, making never-ending phone calls, or sending you items, and performing these acts with a purpose. Stalking is a 1st degree misdemeanor, and if convicted, you can be sentenced up to 1 year in jail or probation and a $1,000 fine. A stalking charge is increased to a 3rd-degree felony if:

  • You are caught stalking after an Injunction protection order has been served by the court.
  • If you have been sentenced for a violation already.
  • If you are caught stalking a minor under 16 years old.

If a situation elevates to you making a threat to another person, such as “I’m watching you,” or “I know where you live,” or leaving threatening letters while stalking a person, this is called aggravated stalking. Aggravated stalking is a 3rd-degree felony, equaling 5 years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

If the threat letters are through texts or emails, or any way through an online messaging system, this is cyberstalking. Cyberstalking occurs in cyberspace, so by way of cell phones, computers, the internet, etc., pretty much anything through technological means. This usually occurs by communicating several times with a person online who has blocked you or trying to access online systems involving the other person, such as their house cameras or social media accounts, without their permission. For more information on cyberstalking, please review our cyberstalking article.


Voyeurism is defined under Florida Statute 810.14 as “When a person, with lewd, lascivious, or indecent intent:

1) Secretly observes another person when the other person is located in a dwelling, structure, or conveyance, and such location provides a reasonable expectation of privacy.

2) Secretly observes another person’s intimate areas (meaning any portion of a person’s body or undergarments that is covered by clothing and intended to be protected from public view) in which the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy when the other person is located in a public or private dwelling, structure, or conveyance.

It is not voyeurism if a person gives their knowledge and consent of the situation. An attorney will argue that knowledge or consent was provided.

Note that voyeurism does not have to involve sexual conduct or pleasure. It can be as simple as watching a person cook dinner in the privacy of their own home, while you are outside in your vehicle with binoculars. The person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in their home, and you are violating that privacy while secretly sitting in your car, purposefully watching them, without their knowledge or consent. Voyeurism is a first-degree misdemeanor. If, however, this is your second or third violation, the court may increase the charge to a third-degree felony.

Voyeurism can include the use of an image or video taken of another person. Nowadays, everyone has a camera in their pocket. Smartphones, tablets, and even Apple Watches can take a picture or a video. People have cameras on their front doors. Stalking and video voyeurism cases have skyrocketed in Florida because of the technology at our disposal. But what constitutes a voyeurism charge to include the word “video?”

For example, Cape Canaveral National Seashore has a nude beach at Lot 13, on Playalinda Beach. There, it would not be voyeurism to look at a person because the person does not have an expectation of privacy at a nude beach. But what about taking a picture or video of a person, for example, walking out of the ocean? Taking a picture would be video voyeurism because you did not receive the individual’s knowledge or consent to take the picture. Distributing that picture would increase the charge to video voyeurism dissemination (distributing the picture to a friend for example) or commercial dissemination (selling the picture to make a profit), depending on what is done with the picture or video after its capture.

So why aren’t voyeurism and stalking the same thing? Note the word, “repeatedly” in the stalking definition. Let’s stick with the example of sitting outside in a vehicle with binoculars. This situation would be voyeurism. However, let’s say this person sits outside with binoculars every day for 3 weeks. Notice the continuous course of conduct, the purpose, the intent of sitting outside every night to watch someone through their window? This would elevate the voyeurism charge to stalking because it isn’t a one-time occurrence.

Understanding the differences between the two types of crimes and arguing your side of the situation can bring down the charges because the other party may have blown the situation out of proportion.

So, you were accused of stalking or committing voyeurism against your ex? Discussing these charges with your criminal defense attorney at the Law Office of Adams & Luka, P.A. is your best option to get the stalking charges dropped to a voyeurism conviction or get all charges dismissed.

Client Reviews

I would like thank my attorney Thomas Luka. I knew from the beginning I had the right guy in my corner. While celebrating with family and friends at a Public Park in Seminole County, a fight broke out among various people. Myself, and a good friend, broke up the fight and the instigators left. Six months later, I was wrongly accused as the person who started the fight. The first attorney I hired could not even get a response from the State Attorney handling the case. Someone referred me to Tom and I felt comfortable at his demeanor and reactions.

After conversations with Tom, who knew I would settle for nothing less than a FULL DISMISSAL due to my innocence, I hired him. His firm of Adams and Luka did the due diligence by interviewing witnesses and the police who were on the scene, as well as starting a dialogue with the State Attorney. After gathering statements from witnesses, Tom was able to present a strong argument on my behalf to the State Attorney on why the case should be dismissed. If the State Attorney was not willing to dismiss the case, Tom was ready to take the case to trial.

The result by Thomas Luka: Case Dismissed.

I am 53 years old with a spotless record and glad to keep it that way thanks to the time, effort, hard work, and professionalism of the Adams and Luka and Tom Luka.

Earl from Mesquite
Thomas Luka left a life-long great impression of lawyers. He was always professional, on time, and answered things honestly. From the start and during the 14 months it went on - Tom was very upfront and honest with me about the possible outcomes. The result was better than I had hoped for. Tom really over-delivered. HIGHLY RECCOMEND. Marcela Giorgi
Adams and Luka were very professional and savvy in the courtroom. When you're in court with Mr. Luka you will think you have the best attorney there. I recommend this law firm. Pioneer Tech
Rich Adams is an outstanding criminal attorney. I have had the opportunity to refer several friends and clients to his practice for handling of criminal matters, and on every occasion he has produced an excellent result. Rich practices with attention to detail, a thorough knowledge of the law, and a passion to defend his clients. I will continue to refer clients to Rich Adams, and would strongly recommend him for your legal needs. Brian Pink
Contact Information